Many Americans think it is, but socialism is something completely different. In socialism industry and commerce are nationalized and the state controls the production of consumer goods; redistribution, on the other hand, is an AFTER-MARKET remedy for inequality – it is perfectly capitalist, which is why all capitalist nations, including us have had it for decades.
Over the past three decades insecurity has been on the rise and inequality has skyrocketed to record levels. While the average family works harder and longer with more earners, tens of millions are uninsured and at risk of economic calamity, the rich have made of with an ever increasing share of income. Brought to you courtesy of Bush, Reagan and the supply-side gospel.
Blue states being the rich states gives the impression that rich people are more likely to vote Democratic. Yet, rich people are less likely to vote Democratic than poor people. In this short video I explain these seemingly contradictory findings.
ABC Obama tells him, “It’s not that I want to punish your success. I just want to make sure that everybody that is behind you, that they have a chance for success too.”
Obama claims that the majority of small businesses make less than 0,000 a year, which is a flat out lie. One of Barack Obamas most potent campaign claims is that he’ll cut taxes for no less than 95% of working families. He’s even promising to cut taxes enough that the governments tax share of GDP will be no more than 18.2% — which is lower than it is today.
Its a clever pitch, because it lets him pose as a middle-class tax cutter while disguising that hes also proposing one of the largest tax increases ever on the other 5%. But how does he conjure this miracle, especially since more than a third of all Americans already pay no income taxes at all? There are several sleights of hand, but the most creative is to redefine the meaning of tax cut. For the Obama Democrats, a tax cut is no longer letting you keep more of what you earn. In their lexicon, a tax cut includes tens of billions of dollars in government handouts that are disguised by the phrase tax credit. Barack Obama is proposing to create or expand no fewer than seven such credits for individuals.
If Barack Obamas goal as President is to spread the wealth around, perhaps his unconditional meetings with Hugo Chavez, Raul Castro, and Kim Jong-Il arent so crazy — if nothing else they can advise an Obama administration on economic policy.
Why is Barack Obama being dishonest to the American people? And why does the mainstream media always cover for his lies?
The answer: Because Obama is nothing more than a tax and spend Liberal who wants to turn America into The United Socialist States of America– he’s a Marxist. And the Obama-Media knows he would never win the election if they actually reported the truth.
“Kim is wonderful and she gets the job done! She is more than capable of wearing many hats. She is very knowledgeable in her field and she gets the task-at-hand accomplished quickly and efficiently. Kim would be an asset to any growing business!“
5 Tips for Converting Leads to Sales - The art of sales is one of the most difficult one can ever learn. This includ... http://t.co/kKChT022 (about 1 day ago)
Why redistribution is NOT socialism
Posted by: Kim Beckers | Comments (0)Many Americans think it is, but socialism is something completely different. In socialism industry and commerce are nationalized and the state controls the production of consumer goods; redistribution, on the other hand, is an AFTER-MARKET remedy for inequality – it is perfectly capitalist, which is why all capitalist nations, including us have had it for decades.